Gaunilo's Cogito Argument

St. Anselm Journal:1-7 (2007)
Download Edit this record How to cite View on PhilPapers
Abstract
Gaunilo presents Anselm with a dilemma in section 7 of his Responsio: I know most certainly that I exist. But If I cannot think my non-existence at the same time, then Anselm's claim in Proslogion 3 (that my inability to think God's non-existence, while knowing most certainly that He exists, is a unique property of God) would be false. If I can do so, however, then I should also be able to know most certainly that God exists and, at the same time, think his non-existence. I will show that Anselm's response to Gaunilo's attack is not adequate because it does not address the issue of certainty, which is at the heart of Gaunilo's objection.
Categories
(categorize this paper)
PhilPapers/Archive ID
IMBGCA
Revision history
Archival date: 2017-09-28
View upload history
References found in this work BETA

No references found.

Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

No citations found.

Add more citations

Added to PP index
2017-09-28

Total views
190 ( #21,059 of 47,362 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
55 ( #13,822 of 47,362 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads since first upload
This graph includes both downloads from PhilArchive and clicks to external links.