Diversity in proof appraisal

In Brendan Larvor (ed.), Mathematical Cultures: The London Meetings 2012--2014. Basel, Switzerland: pp. 163-179 (2016)
Download Edit this record How to cite View on PhilPapers
Abstract
We investigated whether mathematicians typically agree about the qualities of mathematical proofs. Between-mathematician consensus in proof appraisals is an implicit assumption of many arguments made by philosophers of mathematics, but to our knowledge the issue has not previously been empirically investigated. We asked a group of mathematicians to assess a specific proof on four dimensions, using the framework identified by Inglis and Aberdein (2015). We found widespread disagreement between our participants about the aesthetics, intricacy, precision and utility of the proof, suggesting that a priori assumptions about the consistency of mathematical proof appraisals are unreasonable.
Keywords
No keywords specified (fix it)
PhilPapers/Archive ID
INGDIP
Upload history
Archival date: 2020-12-29
View other versions
Added to PP index
2019-02-25

Total views
68 ( #45,053 of 57,036 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
54 ( #13,490 of 57,036 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads since first upload
This graph includes both downloads from PhilArchive and clicks on external links on PhilPapers.