Grading Religions

Sophia 50 (1):189-209 (2011)
Download Edit this record How to cite View on PhilPapers
Abstract
This essay develops standards for grading religions including various forms of spiritualism. First, I examine the standards proposed by William James, John Hick, Paul Knitter, Dan Cohn-Sherbok, and Harold Netland. Most of them are useful in grading religions with or without conditions. However, those standards are not enough for refined and piercing evaluation. Thus, I introduce standards used in spiritualism. Although those standards are for grading spirits and their teachings, they are useful in refined and piercing evaluation of religious phenomena. The spiritual standards complement James's, Hick's, Knitter's, and Netland's standards. Although most of the spiritual standards are rationally unjustifiable, they have practical value.
PhilPapers/Archive ID
IWAGR
Revision history
Archival date: 2018-08-17
View upload history
References found in this work BETA
The Methodology of the Social Sciences.N., E.; Weber, Max; Shils, Edward A. & Finch, Henry A.
Outlines of Scepticism.Sextus Empiricus,

View all 14 references / Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

No citations found.

Add more citations

Added to PP index
2009-09-20

Total views
613 ( #3,469 of 38,962 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
4 ( #37,106 of 38,962 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Monthly downloads since first upload
This graph includes both downloads from PhilArchive and clicks to external links.