A Defense of Intrapersonal Belief Permissivism

Episteme 18 (2):313–327 (2021)
  Copy   BIBTEX


Permissivism is the view that there are evidential situations that rationally permit more than one attitude toward a proposition. In this paper, I argue for Intrapersonal Belief Permissivism (IaBP): that there are evidential situations in which a single agent can rationally adopt more than one belief-attitude toward a proposition. I give two positive arguments for IaBP; the first involves epistemic supererogation and the second involves doubt. Then, I should how these arguments give intrapersonal permissivists a distinct response to the toggling objection. I conclude that IaBP is a view that philosophers should take seriously.

Author's Profile

Elizabeth Jackson
Toronto Metropolitan University


Added to PP

1,137 (#8,012)

6 months
173 (#8,785)

Historical graph of downloads since first upload
This graph includes both downloads from PhilArchive and clicks on external links on PhilPapers.
How can I increase my downloads?