Beliefs and Blameworthiness

Stance 7:7-17 (2014)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

In this paper, I analyze epistemic blameworthiness. After presenting Michael Bergmann’s definition of epistemic blameworthiness, I argue that his definition is problematic because it does not have a control condition. I conclude by offering an improved definition of epistemic blameworthiness and defending this definition against potential counterexamples.

Author's Profile

Elizabeth Jackson
Toronto Metropolitan University

Analytics

Added to PP
2017-01-11

Downloads
467 (#32,110)

6 months
81 (#46,784)

Historical graph of downloads since first upload
This graph includes both downloads from PhilArchive and clicks on external links on PhilPapers.
How can I increase my downloads?