William James's naturalistic account of concepts and his 'rejection of logic'

In Philosophy of Mind in the Nineteenth Century: The History of the Philosophy of Mind, Volume 5. New York: Routledge. pp. 133-146 (2018)
Download Edit this record How to cite View on PhilPapers
William James was one of the most controversial philosophers of the early part of the 20 century, and his apparent skepticism about logic and any robust conception of truth was often simply attributed to his endorsing mysticism and irrationality out of an overwhelming desire to make room for religion in his world-view. However, it will be argued here that James’s pessimism about logic and even truth (or at least ‘absolute’ truth), while most prominent in his later views, stem from the naturalistic conception of concepts developed much earlier in The Principles of Psychology (1890), and it is his commitment to naturalism about our conceptual powers, rather than to any sort of mysticism or irrationalism, that motivates his skepticism about the scope and power of logic, and ultimately about the objectivity of truth itself.
PhilPapers/Archive ID
Revision history
Archival date: 2018-06-30
View upload history
References found in this work BETA
Two Dogmas of Empiricism.Quine, Willard V. O.
The Web of Belief.Quine, W. V. O. & Ullian, J. S.

View all 15 references / Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

No citations found.

Add more citations

Added to PP index

Total views
105 ( #28,810 of 45,285 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
16 ( #37,574 of 45,285 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads since first upload
This graph includes both downloads from PhilArchive and clicks to external links.