Searle on the Intentional Content of Visual Experiences

Download Edit this record How to cite View on PhilPapers
I argue that, holding that the specification of Intentional content of the visual experience should be in the form of a proposition, John Searle gives up the first-person Intentionality and therefore bypasses the first-person important distinction between simple seeing and judgmental seeing. The specification of the content only in the form of the proposition does not allow making such a distinction on the level of description. Then I argue that the feature of the causal self-referentiality of the visual experience belongs to its psychological mode but not, as Searle holds, to the Intentional content of the visual experience
PhilPapers/Archive ID
Revision history
Archival date: 2016-01-11
View upload history
References found in this work BETA
Intentionality: An Essay in the Philosophy of Mind.Peacocke, Christopher & Searle, John R.
Logical Investigations.Husserl, Edmund & Findlay, J. N.
Perception.Mulligan, Kevin

View all 7 references / Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

No citations found.

Add more citations

Added to PP index

Total views
54 ( #32,162 of 41,458 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
5 ( #40,454 of 41,458 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads since first upload
This graph includes both downloads from PhilArchive and clicks to external links.