Abstract
I argue that, holding
that the specification of Intentional content of the visual experience should be in the
form of a proposition, John Searle gives up the first-person Intentionality and therefore
bypasses the first-person important distinction between simple seeing and judgmental
seeing. The specification of the content only in the form of the proposition does not allow
making such a distinction on the level of description. Then I argue that the feature
of the causal self-referentiality of the visual experience belongs to its psychological mode
but not, as Searle holds, to the Intentional content of the visual experience