Alethic undecidability doesn’t solve the Liar

Analysis 76 (3):278-283 (2016)
Download Edit this record How to cite View on PhilPapers
Stephen Barker presents a novel approach to solving semantic paradoxes, including the Liar and its variants and Curry’s paradox. His approach is based around the concept of alethic undecidability. His approach, if successful, renders futile all attempts to assign semantic properties to the paradoxical sentences, whilst leaving classical logic fully intact. And, according to Barker, even the T-scheme remains valid, for validity is not undermined by undecidable instances. Barker’s approach is innovative and worthy of further consideration, particularly by those of us who aim to find a solution without logical revisionism. As it stands, however, the approach is unsuccessful, as I shall demonstrate below.
(categorize this paper)
PhilPapers/Archive ID
Revision history
Archival date: 2016-03-29
View upload history
References found in this work BETA
Motivation and Agency.Mele, Alfred R.

View all 20 references / Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

No citations found.

Add more citations

Added to PP index

Total views
247 ( #16,767 of 47,165 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
22 ( #31,390 of 47,165 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads since first upload
This graph includes both downloads from PhilArchive and clicks to external links.