Reasoning's relation to bodily action

Ratio 33 (2):87-96 (2020)
Download Edit this record How to cite View on PhilPapers
Abstract
Recent philosophical work on the relation between reasoning and bodily action is dominated by two views. It is orthodox to have it that bodily actions can be at most causally involved in reasoning. Others have it that reasoning can constitutively involve bodily actions, where this is understood as a matter of non‐mental bodily events featuring as constituents of practical reasoning. Reflection on cases of reasoning out‐loud suggests a neglected alternative on which both practical and theoretical reasoning can have bodily actions as constituents, where such bodily actions themselves amount to contentful mental events. Furthermore, the natural lines of resistance to this view trade on type‐token errors, or on a questionable common‐factor assumption.
PhilPapers/Archive ID
JENRRT-2
Upload history
Archival date: 2020-03-01
View other versions
Added to PP index
2020-02-29

Total views
75 ( #40,984 of 54,368 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
26 ( #26,835 of 54,368 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads since first upload
This graph includes both downloads from PhilArchive and clicks on external links on PhilPapers.