Reasoning's relation to bodily action

Ratio 33 (2):87-96 (2020)
Download Edit this record How to cite View on PhilPapers
Recent philosophical work on the relation between reasoning and bodily action is dominated by two views. It is orthodox to have it that bodily actions can be at most causally involved in reasoning. Others have it that reasoning can constitutively involve bodily actions, where this is understood as a matter of non‐mental bodily events featuring as constituents of practical reasoning. Reflection on cases of reasoning out‐loud suggests a neglected alternative on which both practical and theoretical reasoning can have bodily actions as constituents, where such bodily actions themselves amount to contentful mental events. Furthermore, the natural lines of resistance to this view trade on type‐token errors, or on a questionable common‐factor assumption.
PhilPapers/Archive ID
Upload history
Archival date: 2020-03-01
View other versions
Added to PP index

Total views
157 ( #43,120 of 72,515 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
35 ( #24,670 of 72,515 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads since first upload
This graph includes both downloads from PhilArchive and clicks on external links on PhilPapers.