Molinism and Theological Compatibilism

Download Edit this record How to cite View on PhilPapers
In a series of recent papers John Martin Fischer argues that the Molinist solution to the problem of reconciling divine omniscience with human freedom does not offer such a solution at all. Instead, he maintains, Molina simply presupposes theological compatibilism. However, Fischer construes the problem in terms of sempiternalist omniscience, whereas classical Molinism adopts atemporalism. I argue that, moreover, an atemporalist reformulation of Fischer’s argument designed to show that Molinism is not even consistent is unsuccessful as well, since it employs a transfer principle about causal inaccessibility that Molina rightfully rejects.
PhilPapers/Archive ID
Upload history
Archival date: 2015-06-08
View other versions
Added to PP index

Total views
468 ( #11,950 of 2,428,026 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
39 ( #20,060 of 2,428,026 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads since first upload
This graph includes both downloads from PhilArchive and clicks on external links on PhilPapers.