Modal Structuralism and Theism

In Fiona Ellis (ed.), New Models of Religious Understanding. Oxford: Oxford University Press (forthcoming)
Download Edit this record How to cite View on PhilPapers
Abstract
Drawing an analogy between modal structuralism about mathematics and theism, I o er a structuralist account that implicitly de nes theism in terms of three basic relations: logical and metaphysical priority, and epis- temic superiority. On this view, statements like `God is omniscient' have a hypothetical and a categorical component. The hypothetical component provides a translation pattern according to which statements in theistic language are converted into statements of second-order modal logic. The categorical component asserts the logical possibility of the theism struc- ture on the basis of uncontroversial facts about the physical world. This structuralist reading of theism preserves objective truth-values for theistic statements while remaining neutral on the question of ontology. Thus, it o ers a way of understanding theism to which a naturalist cannot object, and it accommodates the fact that religious belief, for many theists, is an essentially relational matter.
PhilPapers/Archive ID
JONMSA-6
Revision history
Archival date: 2017-09-05
View upload history
References found in this work BETA
Mathematical Truth.Benacerraf, Paul

View all 7 references / Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

No citations found.

Add more citations

Added to PP index
2016-11-01

Total views
87 ( #26,392 of 40,686 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
54 ( #10,463 of 40,686 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads since first upload
This graph includes both downloads from PhilArchive and clicks to external links.