The problem with descriptive correctness

Ratio 33 (2):79-86 (2020)
Download Edit this record How to cite View on PhilPapers
In the 1980s and early 1990s, the normativity of meaning was thought to be more-or-less 'incontestable.' But in the last 25 years, many philosophers of mind and language have contested it in several seemingly different ways. This, however, is somewhat illusory. There is an unappreciated commonality among most anti-normativist arguments, and this commonality, I argue, poses a problem for anti-normativism. The result, however, is not a wholesale rejection of anti-normativism. Rather, an insight from the anti-normativist position can be harnessed to reveal an unappreciated position in the normativity of meaning debate.
PhilPapers/Archive ID
Upload history
First archival date: 2020-03-12
Latest version: 2 (2020-05-27)
View other versions
Added to PP index

Total views
106 ( #45,839 of 65,614 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
30 ( #26,988 of 65,614 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads since first upload
This graph includes both downloads from PhilArchive and clicks on external links on PhilPapers.