The Forfeiture Theory of Punishment: Surviving Boonin’s Objections

Public Affairs Quarterly 24 (4):319-334 (2010)
Download Edit this record How to cite View on PhilPapers
Abstract
In this paper, I set out a version of the Forfeiture Theory of Punishment. Forfeiture Theory: Legal punishment is just or permissible because offenders forfeit their rights.On this account, offenders forfeit their rights because they infringed on someone’s rights. My strategy is to provide a version of the Forfeiture Theory and then to argue that it survives a number of initially intuitive seeming objections, most having their origins in the recent work of David Boonin.
PhilPapers/Archive ID
KERTFT
Revision history
Archival date: 2020-03-24
View upload history
References found in this work BETA

No references found.

Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

No citations found.

Add more citations

Added to PP index
2015-02-04

Total views
15 ( #47,332 of 47,315 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
9 ( #45,539 of 47,315 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads since first upload
This graph includes both downloads from PhilArchive and clicks to external links.