Innateness as a natural cognitive kind

Philosophical Psychology 29 (3):319-333 (2016)
Download Edit this record How to cite View on PhilPapers
Abstract
Innate cognitive capacities are widely posited in cognitive science, yet both philosophers and scientists have criticized the concept of innateness as being hopelessly confused. Despite a number of recent attempts to define or characterize innateness, critics have charged that it is associated with a diverse set of properties and encourages unwarranted inferences among properties that are frequently unrelated. This criticism can be countered by showing that the properties associated with innateness cluster together in reliable ways, at least in the context of the study of cognition. Even though the causal connections between these cognitive properties are not always strict, they are robust enough to warrant considering innateness to be a natural kind as used in contemporary cognitive science.
Reprint years
2016
PhilPapers/Archive ID
KHAIAA-3
Upload history
Archival date: 2020-11-28
View other versions
Added to PP index
2015-10-08

Total views
190 ( #32,354 of 64,256 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
101 ( #5,966 of 64,256 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads since first upload
This graph includes both downloads from PhilArchive and clicks on external links on PhilPapers.