The Possibility of Moral Dilemmas Based on Arguments form Emotional Experience

Metaphysics 11 (27):95-110 (2019)
Download Edit this record How to cite View on PhilPapers
Abstract
Moral dilemmas are situations in which the agents are provided by two conflicting moral judgments but it's not possible for them to act upon both judgments at the same time. Proponents of moral dilemmas say that agents in conflicting situations, have to act in a way that it is morally wrong. Agents will experience negative feelings such as guilt, regret and remorse, no matter which alternative is chosen by them. Opponents, on the other hand, argue in contrary and say that these situations don't avoid incoherence in a moral theory. They claim that although a good moral theory should be action guiding in any situation, it shouldn’t provide the agent with two conflicting moral judgments. Moral dilemmas violate the principle of being action guiding in a moral theory. Proponents often argue in virtue ethics framework and believe that virtue ethic theory is coherent and action guiding and it provides an appropriate explanation for moral dilemmas. Keywords
Categories
(categorize this paper)
PhilPapers/Archive ID
KHATPO-14
Upload history
Archival date: 2019-05-27
View other versions
Added to PP index
2019-05-27

Total views
41 ( #46,504 of 52,678 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
12 ( #39,609 of 52,678 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads since first upload
This graph includes both downloads from PhilArchive and clicks on external links on PhilPapers.