Contrary-to-Duty Scenarios, Deontic Dilemmas, and Transmission Principles

Ethics 129 (1):98-115 (2018)
Download Edit this record How to cite View on PhilPapers
Abstract
Actualists hold that contrary-to-duty scenarios give rise to deontic dilemmas and provide counterexamples to the transmission principle, according to which we ought to take the necessary means to actions we ought to perform. In an earlier article, I have argued, contrary to actualism, that the notion of ‘ought’ that figures in conclusions of practical deliberation does not allow for deontic dilemmas and validates the transmission principle. Here I defend these claims, together with my possibilist account of contrary-to-duty scenarios, against Stephen White’s recent criticism.
PhilPapers/Archive ID
KIECSD-2
Revision history
Archival date: 2018-04-17
View upload history
References found in this work BETA

View all 21 references / Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

No citations found.

Add more citations

Added to PP index
2018-04-17

Total downloads
291 ( #8,726 of 37,108 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
141 ( #2,091 of 37,108 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Monthly downloads since first upload
This graph includes both downloads from PhilArchive and clicks to external links.