Contrary-to-Duty Scenarios, Deontic Dilemmas, and Transmission Principles

Ethics 129 (1):98-115 (2018)
Download Edit this record How to cite View on PhilPapers
Actualists hold that contrary-to-duty scenarios give rise to deontic dilemmas and provide counterexamples to the transmission principle, according to which we ought to take the necessary means to actions we ought to perform. In an earlier article, I have argued, contrary to actualism, that the notion of ‘ought’ that figures in conclusions of practical deliberation does not allow for deontic dilemmas and validates the transmission principle. Here I defend these claims, together with my possibilist account of contrary-to-duty scenarios, against Stephen White’s recent criticism.
PhilPapers/Archive ID
Revision history
Archival date: 2018-04-17
View upload history
References found in this work BETA
The Normativity of Rationality.Kiesewetter, Benjamin

View all 28 references / Add more references

Citations of this work BETA
What Kind of Perspectivism?Kiesewetter, Benjamin
Actualism and Possibilism in Ethics.Timmerman, Travis & Cohen, Yishai

Add more citations

Added to PP index

Total views
591 ( #6,510 of 50,290 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
103 ( #4,744 of 50,290 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads since first upload
This graph includes both downloads from PhilArchive and clicks to external links.