Instrumental Normativity: In Defense of the Transmission Principle

Ethics 125 (4):921-946 (2015)
Download Edit this record How to cite View on PhilPapers
If you ought to perform a certain act, and some other action is a necessary means for you to perform that act, then you ought to perform that other action as well – or so it seems plausible to say. This transmission principle is of both practical and theoretical significance. The aim of this paper is to defend this principle against a number of recent objections, which (as I show) are all based on core assumptions of the view called actualism. I reject actualism, provide an alternative explanation of its plausible features, and present an independent argument for the transmission principle.
PhilPapers/Archive ID
Revision history
First archival date: 2014-08-08
Latest version: 3 (2017-07-06)
View upload history
References found in this work BETA
The Moral Problem.Smith, Michael
Why Be Rational?Kolodny, Niko

View all 33 references / Add more references

Citations of this work BETA
What Kind of Perspectivism?Kiesewetter, Benjamin

View all 15 citations / Add more citations

Added to PP index

Total views
550 ( #3,701 of 37,198 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
121 ( #2,533 of 37,198 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Monthly downloads since first upload
This graph includes both downloads from PhilArchive and clicks to external links.