Where is your pain? A Cross-cultural Comparison of the Concept of Pain in Americans and South Korea

Studia Philosophica Estonica 9 (1):136-169 (2016)
  Copy   BIBTEX


Philosophical orthodoxy holds that pains are mental states, taking this to reflect the ordinary conception of pain. Despite this, evidence is mounting that English speakers do not tend to conceptualize pains in this way; rather, they tend to treat pains as being bodily states. We hypothesize that this is driven by two primary factors—the phenomenology of feeling pains and the surface grammar of pain reports. There is reason to expect that neither of these factors is culturally specific, however, and thus reason to expect that the empirical findings for English speakers will generalize to other cultures and other languages. In this article we begin to test this hypothesis, reporting the results of two cross-cultural studies comparing judgments about the location of referred pains between two groups—Americans and South Koreans—that we might otherwise expect to differ in how they understand pains. In line with our predictions, we find that both groups tend to conceive of pains as bodily states.

Author Profiles

Hyo-eun Kim
Hanbat National University, Korea
Justin Sytsma
Victoria University of Wellington
Nina Poth
Humboldt University, Berlin
1 more


Added to PP

264 (#46,817)

6 months
102 (#20,080)

Historical graph of downloads since first upload
This graph includes both downloads from PhilArchive and clicks on external links on PhilPapers.
How can I increase my downloads?