A Few Thoughts on Cognitive Overload

Intellectica 1 (30):19-51 (2000)
Download Edit this record How to cite View on PhilPapers
Abstract
This article addresses three main questions: What causes cognitive overload in the workplace? What analytical framework should be used to understand how agents interact with their work environments? How can environments be restructured to improve the cognitive workflow of agents? Four primary causes of overload are identified: too much tasking and interruption, and inadequate workplace infrastructure to help reduce the need for planning, monitoring, reminding, reclassifying information, etc… The first step in reducing the cognitive impact of these causes is to enrich classical frameworks for understanding work environments, such as Newell and Simon’s notion of a task environment, by recognizing that our actual workplace is a superposition of many specific environments – activity spaces – which we slip between. Each has its own cost structure arising from the tools and resources available, including the cognitive strategies and interpretational frameworks of individual agents. These cognitive factors are significant, affecting how easy or difficult it is to perform an action, such as finding a specific paper in a “mess” desk. A few simple examples show how work environments can be redesigned and how restructuring can alter the cost structure of activity spaces.
PhilPapers/Archive ID
KIRAFT
Revision history
Archival date: 2013-02-19
View upload history
References found in this work BETA

No references found.

Add more references

Citations of this work BETA
Un Cadre Méthodologique Pour le Design des Environnements Augmentés.Lahlou, Saadi; Nosulenko, Valery & Samoylenko, Elena

Add more citations

Added to PP index
2013-02-19

Total views
3,444 ( #293 of 42,195 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
664 ( #379 of 42,195 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads since first upload
This graph includes both downloads from PhilArchive and clicks to external links.