Misreading the Unparticipated Source of Difference in Deleuze's Reversal of Platonism

Epoché: A Journal for the History of Philosophy 18 (1):205-225 (2013)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

In this article, I argue that in his “reversal of Platonism” in The Logic of Sense, Gilles Deleuze does not adequately consider in what sense Plotinus identifies The One as “unparticipated.” I further claim that when The One is understood in the sense I consider Plotinus to have presented it, it shows itself to have attributes similar to Deleuze’s “dark precursor,” insofar as both The One and the dark precursor are ineffable, are inexhaustible, and contain absolute generative power. I propose that examining conceptual similarities between the works of such figures—about whose concepts similarity is undoubtedly counter-intuitive—sheds interesting light on important characteristics of Platonism, and in particular about the underappreciated sense in which the concept of difference is richly developed in the Platonic tradition

Author's Profile

Gregory Kirk
Northern Arizona University

Analytics

Added to PP
2013-11-24

Downloads
237 (#81,290)

6 months
112 (#45,425)

Historical graph of downloads since first upload
This graph includes both downloads from PhilArchive and clicks on external links on PhilPapers.
How can I increase my downloads?