The evolutionary psychology of human mating: A response to Buller's critique

Download Edit this record How to cite View on PhilPapers
Abstract
In this paper, I critique arguments made by philosopher David Buller against central evolutionary-psychological explanations of human mating. Specifically, I aim to rebut his criticisms of Evolutionary Psychology regarding (1) women's long-term mating preferences for high-status men; (2) the evolutionary rationale behind men's provisioning of women; (3) men's mating preferences for young women; (4) women's adaptation for extra-pair sex; (5) the sex-differentiated evolutionary theory of human jealousy; and (6) the notion of mate value. In sum, I aim to demonstrate that Buller's arguments contra Evolutionary Psychologists are left wanting.
PhilPapers/Archive ID
KLATEP
Revision history
Archival date: 2014-06-19
View upload history
References found in this work BETA

View all 16 references / Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

No citations found.

Add more citations

Added to PP index
2014-06-13

Total downloads
251 ( #8,925 of 34,546 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
25 ( #12,736 of 34,546 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Monthly downloads since first upload
This graph includes both downloads from PhilArchive and clicks to external links.