The evolutionary psychology of human mating: A response to Buller's critique

Download Edit this record How to cite View on PhilPapers
In this paper, I critique arguments made by philosopher David Buller against central evolutionary-psychological explanations of human mating. Specifically, I aim to rebut his criticisms of Evolutionary Psychology regarding (1) women's long-term mating preferences for high-status men; (2) the evolutionary rationale behind men's provisioning of women; (3) men's mating preferences for young women; (4) women's adaptation for extra-pair sex; (5) the sex-differentiated evolutionary theory of human jealousy; and (6) the notion of mate value. In sum, I aim to demonstrate that Buller's arguments contra Evolutionary Psychologists are left wanting.
PhilPapers/Archive ID
Upload history
Archival date: 2014-06-19
View other versions
Added to PP index

Total views
466 ( #16,676 of 71,342 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
20 ( #39,397 of 71,342 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads since first upload
This graph includes both downloads from PhilArchive and clicks on external links on PhilPapers.