The Unplanned Obsolescence of Psychological Science and an Argument for its Revival

Download Edit this record How to cite View on PhilPapers
Abstract
I examine some of the key scientific pre-commitments of modern psychology, and argue that their adoption has the unintended consequence of rendering a purely psychological analysis of mind indistinguishable from a purely biological treatment. And, since these pre-commitments sanction an “authority of the biological”, explanation of phenomena traditionally considered the purview of psychological analysis is fully subsumed under the biological. I next evaluate the epistemic warrant of these pre-commitments and suggest there are good reasons to question their applicability to psychological science. I conclude that experiential aspects of reality give us reason to remain open to the need for psychological explanation in the treatment of mind.
PhilPapers/Archive ID
KLEP-13
Revision history
First archival date: 2015-08-11
Latest version: 54 (2018-06-26)
View upload history
References found in this work BETA
The Embodied Mind: Cognitive Science and Human Experience.Varela, Francisco; Thompson, Evan & Rosch, Eleanor
The Phenomenological Mind.Gallagher, Shaun & Zahavi, Dan
Mental Reality.Strawson, Galen

View all 70 references / Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

Add more citations

Added to PP index
2015-08-11

Total views
657 ( #4,016 of 43,016 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
90 ( #5,644 of 43,016 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads since first upload
This graph includes both downloads from PhilArchive and clicks to external links.