The Unplanned Obsolescence of Psychological Science and an Argument for its Revival

Download Edit this record How to cite View on PhilPapers
I examine some of the key scientific pre-commitments of modern psychology, and argue that their adoption has the unintended consequence of rendering a purely psychological analysis of mind indistinguishable from a purely biological treatment. And, since these pre-commitments sanction an “authority of the biological”, explanation of phenomena traditionally considered the purview of psychological analysis is fully subsumed under the biological. I next evaluate the epistemic warrant of these pre-commitments and suggest there are good reasons to question their applicability to psychological science. I conclude that experiential aspects of reality give us reason to remain open to the need for psychological explanation in the treatment of mind.
PhilPapers/Archive ID
Upload history
First archival date: 2015-08-11
Latest version: 54 (2018-06-26)
View other versions
Added to PP index

Total views
1,079 ( #5,318 of 71,198 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
95 ( #7,480 of 71,198 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads since first upload
This graph includes both downloads from PhilArchive and clicks on external links on PhilPapers.