The Unplanned Obsolescence of Psychological Science and an Argument for its Revival

Download Edit this record How to cite View on PhilPapers
Abstract
I examine some of the key scientific pre-commitments of modern psychology, and argue that their adoption has the unintended consequence of rendering a purely psychological analysis of mind indistinguishable from a purely biological treatment. And, since these pre-commitments sanction an “authority of the biological”, explanation of phenomena traditionally considered the purview of psychological analysis is fully subsumed under the biological. I next evaluate the epistemic warrant of these pre-commitments and suggest there are good reasons to question their applicability to psychological science. I conclude that experiential aspects of reality give us reason to remain open to the need for psychological explanation in the treatment of mind.
PhilPapers/Archive ID
KLEP-13
Revision history
First archival date: 2015-08-11
Latest version: 54 (2018-06-26)
View upload history
References found in this work BETA

No references found.

Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

No citations found.

Add more citations

Added to PP index
2015-08-11

Total downloads
540 ( #3,798 of 37,176 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
102 ( #3,128 of 37,176 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Monthly downloads since first upload
This graph includes both downloads from PhilArchive and clicks to external links.