Decisions and the Evolution of Memory: Multiple Systems, Multiple Functions

Psychological Review 109:306-329 (2002)
Download Edit this record How to cite View on PhilPapers
Memory evolved to supply useful, timely information to the organism’s decision-making systems. Therefore, decision rules, multiple memory systems, and the search engines that link them should have coevolved to mesh in a coadapted, functionally interlocking way. This adaptationist perspective suggested the scope hypothesis: When a generalization is retrieved from semantic memory, episodic memories that are inconsistent with it should be retrieved in tandem to place boundary conditions on the scope of the generalization. Using a priming paradigm and a decision task involving person memory, the authors tested and confirmed this hypothesis. The results support the view that priming is an evolved adaptation. They further show that dissociations between memory systems are not—and should not be—absolute: Independence exists for some tasks but not others.
PhilPapers/Archive ID
Upload history
Archival date: 2014-11-22
View other versions
Added to PP index

Total views
3,069 ( #941 of 64,219 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
245 ( #1,850 of 64,219 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads since first upload
This graph includes both downloads from PhilArchive and clicks on external links on PhilPapers.