The Role of Entscheider in the Asylum Procedure: A Legal and Ethical Analysis

Proceedings of the 2018 ZiF Workshop “Studying Migration Policies at the Interface Between Empirical Research and Normative Analysis” (2019)
Download Edit this record How to cite View on PhilPapers
Abstract
In this article we examine the role of Entscheider (decision-makers) in the German asylum procedure, both legally and ethical. As the responsibility for deciding on asylum applications lies exclusively with them, their significance for the German asylum procedure can hardly be underestimated. However, over the last few decades the situation of Entscheider changed significantly: While the number and complexity of the cases they have to decide on has increased due to the growing immigration, the requirements for their education have been lowered, owed to critical amendments to the relevant law. We analyze how the law currently defines the role of Entscheider, whether the legal framework is constitutional, and what modifications morality requires. Although the law defining their role seems to be constitutional, Entscheider’s education must be improved and they must be entrusted with the hearing of the applicants to meet what morality requires, we conclude. DOI: 10.17879/95189429199.
Categories
(categorize this paper)
PhilPapers/Archive ID
KLETRO-14
Upload history
First archival date: 2019-05-03
Latest version: 1 (2019-05-03)
View other versions
Added to PP index
2019-05-03

Total views
61 ( #42,159 of 52,895 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
16 ( #34,627 of 52,895 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads since first upload
This graph includes both downloads from PhilArchive and clicks on external links on PhilPapers.