Three Myths of Intentionality Versus Some Medieval Philosophers

International Journal of Philosophical Studies 21 (3):359-376 (2013)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

This paper argues that three characteristic modern positions concerning intentionality – namely, (1) that intentionality is ‘the mark of the mental’; (2) that intentionality concerns a specific type of objects having intentional inexistence; and (3) that intentionality somehow defies logic – are just three ‘modern myths’ that medieval philosophers, from whom the modern notion supposedly originated, would definitely reject.

Author's Profile

Gyula Klima
Fordham University

Analytics

Added to PP
2009-01-28

Downloads
906 (#14,304)

6 months
141 (#22,167)

Historical graph of downloads since first upload
This graph includes both downloads from PhilArchive and clicks on external links on PhilPapers.
How can I increase my downloads?