Hegel’s modal argument against Spinozism. An interpretation of the chapter ‘Actuality’ in the Science of Logic

Hegel Bulletin 36 (1):53-79 (2015)
Download Edit this record How to cite View on PhilPapers
Abstract
I propose a new reading of Hegel’s discussion of modality in the ‘Actuality’ chapter of the Science of Logic. On this reading, the main purpose of the chapter is a critical engagement with Spinoza’s modal metaphysics. Hegel first reconstructs a rationalist line of thought — corresponding to the cosmological argument for the existence of God — that ultimately leads to Spinozist necessitarianism. He then presents a reductio argument against necessitarianism, contending that as a consequence of necessitarianism, no adequate explanatory accounts of facts about finite reality can be given.
PhilPapers/Archive ID
KNAHMA
Revision history
Archival date: 2015-06-15
View upload history
References found in this work BETA

View all 18 references / Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

Add more citations

Added to PP index
2015-06-15

Total views
222 ( #15,030 of 42,385 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
39 ( #17,191 of 42,385 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads since first upload
This graph includes both downloads from PhilArchive and clicks to external links.