Contextualism vs. Relativism: More empirical data

Download Edit this record How to cite View on PhilPapers
Abstract
Contextualism is the view that the extension of perspectival claims (involving e.g. predicates of personal taste or epistemic modals) depends on the context of utterance. Relativism is the view that the extension of perspectival claims depends on the context of assessment. Both views make concrete, empirically testable predictions about how such claims are used by ordinary English language speakers. This chapter surveys some of the recent empirical literature on the topic and presents four new experiments (total N=724). Consistent with contextualism and inconsistent with relativism, the results suggest that the extension of perspectival claims depends on the context of utterance, not the context of assessment.
PhilPapers/Archive ID
KNECVR
Upload history
Archival date: 2021-11-01
View other versions
Added to PP index
2021-11-01

Total views
58 ( #56,098 of 65,755 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
58 ( #14,038 of 65,755 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads since first upload
This graph includes both downloads from PhilArchive and clicks on external links on PhilPapers.