Norms of assertion in the United States, Germany, and Japan

Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America 118 (37):e2105365118 (2021)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

The recent controversy about misinformation has moved a question into the focus of the public eye that has occupied philosophers for decades: Under what conditions is it appropriate to assert a certain claim? When asserting a claim that x, must one know that x? Must x be true? Might it be normatively acceptable to assert whatever one believes? In the largest cross-cultural study to date (total n = 1,091) on the topic, findings from the United States, Germany, and Japan suggest that, in order to claim that x, x need not be known, and it can be false. However, the data show, we do expect considerable epistemic responsibility on the speaker’s behalf: In order to appropriately assert a claim, the speaker must have good reasons to believe it.

Author's Profile

Markus Kneer
University of Zürich

Analytics

Added to PP
2021-09-15

Downloads
61 (#64,653)

6 months
27 (#38,328)

Historical graph of downloads since first upload
This graph includes both downloads from PhilArchive and clicks on external links on PhilPapers.
How can I increase my downloads?