Utilitarian moral judgment in psychopathy

Download Edit this record How to cite View on PhilPapers
Psychopathic behavior is characteristically amoral, but to date research studies have largely failed to identify any systematic differences in moral judgment capability between psychopaths and non-psychopaths. In this study, we investigate whether significant differences in moral judgment emerge when taking into account the phenotypic heterogeneity of the disorder through a well-validated distinction between psychopathic subtypes. Three groups of incarcerated participants [low-anxious psychopaths (n 1⁄4 12), high-anxious psychopaths (n 1⁄4 12) and non-psychopaths (n 1⁄4 24)] completed a moral judgment test involving hypothet- ical dilemmas. The moral dilemmas featured personal (i.e. involving direct physical harm) or impersonal (i.e. involving indirect or remote harm) actions. Compared to non-psychopaths, both groups of psychopaths were significantly more likely to endorse the impersonal actions. However, only the low-anxious psychopaths were significantly more likely to endorse the personal harms when commission of the harm would maximize aggregate welfare the utilitarian choice. High-anxious psychopaths and non-psychopaths did not significantly differ in their personal moral judgments. These results provide novel laboratory evidence of abnormal moral judgment in psychopaths, as well as additional support for the importance of considering psychopathic subtypes.
PhilPapers/Archive ID
Revision history
Archival date: 2015-11-03
View upload history
References found in this work BETA
Cognitive Load Selectively Interferes with Utilitarian Moral Judgment.Greene, Joshua D.; Morelli, Sylvia A.; Lowenberg, Kelly; Nystrom, Leigh E. & Cohen, Jonathan D.
The Mask of Sanity.Cleckley, Hervey

View all 8 references / Add more references

Citations of this work BETA
‘Utilitarian’ Judgments in Sacrificial Moral Dilemmas Do Not Reflect Impartial Concern for the Greater Good.Kahane, Guy; Everett, Jim A. C.; Earp, Brian D.; Farias, Miguel & Savulescu, Julian
Beyond Sacrificial Harm: A Two-Dimensional Model of Utilitarian Psychology.Kahane, Guy; Everett, Jim A. C.; Earp, Brian D.; Caviola, Lucius; Faber, Nadira S.; Crockett, Molly J. & Savulescu, Julian

View all 37 citations / Add more citations

Added to PP index

Total views
318 ( #14,058 of 50,081 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
43 ( #14,287 of 50,081 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads since first upload
This graph includes both downloads from PhilArchive and clicks to external links.