Dispensing with the generic sense of" art'

Download Edit this record How to cite View on PhilPapers
The question of whether the term ”art,” or art as an array of objects, can be defined depends upon the sense of “art” and its extension. The generic sense of “art” is its broadest meaning having its widest extension. I argue that the term is very much like the generic term “science.” Uses of both terms don’t depend upon rigorous definition. Rather, the terms organize an enormous number of varied and sometimes incompatible sub-categories. Most informative topics in art and science are under these sub-categories. As dynamic areas of activity, art and science continue to evolve without an efficacious generic sense. We can dispense with it for these purposes.
PhilPapers/Archive ID
Upload history
Archival date: 2019-03-22
View other versions
Added to PP index

Total views
46 ( #51,355 of 58,296 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
3 ( #57,955 of 58,296 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads since first upload
This graph includes both downloads from PhilArchive and clicks on external links on PhilPapers.