Theoretical Controversies—Terminological Biases: Consciousness Revisited

Studies in Logic, Grammar and Rhetoric 41 (1):143-160 (2015)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

Although scientific practice sometimes encounters philosophical dif- ficulties, it cannot shoulder the burden of resolving them. This can lead to controversies. An unavoidable difficulty is rooted in the linguistic attitude, i.e., in the fact that to a considerable extent we express our thoughts in words. I will attempt to illuminate some important characteristics of linguistic expres- sion which lead to paradoxical situations, identifiable thanks to philosophy. In my argument, I will investigate how the notion of consciousness has altered over the course of philosophical investigation and how it relates to recent scientific practice. In conclusion, I will focus on a few recent so-called radical positions in philosophy with regard to a framework within which consciousness and more generally mental phenomena can be regarded in a new light, as well as on the barriers we face when trying to unify scientific results.

Author's Profile

Zsuzsanna Kondor
Research Centre for The Humanities. Institute of Philosophy

Analytics

Added to PP
2015-07-27

Downloads
185 (#73,652)

6 months
81 (#55,850)

Historical graph of downloads since first upload
This graph includes both downloads from PhilArchive and clicks on external links on PhilPapers.
How can I increase my downloads?