Kidney Sales and the Burden of Proof

Journal of Practical Ethics 7 (3):32-53 (2019)
Download Edit this record How to cite View on PhilPapers
Abstract
Janet Radcliffe Richards’ The Ethics of Transplants outlines a novel framework for moral inquiry in practical contexts and applies it to the topic of paid living kidney donation. In doing so, Radcliffe Richards makes two key claims: that opponents of organ markets bear the burden of proof, and that this burden has not yet been satisfied. This paper raises four related objections to Radcliffe Richards’ methodological framework, focusing largely on how Radcliffe Richards uses this framework in her discussion of kidney sales. We conclude that Radcliffe Richards’ method of inquiry hinders our ability to answer the very question that it ought to help us resolve: What is there best reason to do, all things considered?
PhilPapers/Archive ID
KOPKSA-2
Upload history
Archival date: 2020-02-06
View other versions
Added to PP index
2020-02-06

Total views
113 ( #41,943 of 2,448,214 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
14 ( #40,220 of 2,448,214 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads since first upload
This graph includes both downloads from PhilArchive and clicks on external links on PhilPapers.