Easy Ontology without Deflationary Metaontology

Download Edit this record How to cite View on PhilPapers
Abstract
This is a contribution to a symposium on Amie Thomasson’s Ontology Made Easy (2015). Thomasson defends two deflationary theses: that philosophical questions about the existence of numbers, tables, properties, and other disputed entities can all easily be answered, and that there is something wrong with prolonged debates about whether such objects exist. I argue that the first thesis (properly understood) does not by itself entail the second. Rather, the case for deflationary metaontology rests largely on a controversial doctrine about the possible meanings of ‘object’. I challenge Thomasson's argument for that doctrine, and I make a positive case for the availability of the contested, unrestricted use of ‘object’.
Keywords
No keywords specified (fix it)
PhilPapers/Archive ID
KOREOW-2
Revision history
First archival date: 2018-09-21
Latest version: 2 (2019-07-12)
View upload history
References found in this work BETA
Ontology Made Easy.Thomasson, Amie
Naming and Necessity.Kripke, Saul A.
Plural Predication.McKay, Thomas
Ordinary Objects.Thomasson, Amie

View all 10 references / Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

Add more citations

Added to PP index
2018-09-21

Total views
176 ( #17,665 of 41,604 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
86 ( #5,778 of 41,604 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads since first upload
This graph includes both downloads from PhilArchive and clicks to external links.