Reply to Simion

Logos and Episteme 8 (1):113-116 (2017)
Download Edit this record How to cite View on PhilPapers
Abstract
Mona Simion questions whether there is a distinction between taking back an assertion and taking back only the content of an assertion, as I have claimed. After arguing against the distinction in question, Simion grants that there is a difference between the cases that I use to illustrate the distinction, and thus turns to the task of explaining the difference in a way that keeps it from undermining the knowledge norm. The explanation she offers is in terms of a distinction between doing something that is wrong and doing something that is blameworthy. I respond here by defending the distinction and questioning the explanation she gives of it.
Categories
ISBN(s)
2069-0533
PhilPapers/Archive ID
KVARTS
Upload history
Archival date: 2017-03-28
View other versions
Added to PP index
2017-03-28

Total views
75 ( #50,575 of 64,200 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
5 ( #58,637 of 64,200 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads since first upload
This graph includes both downloads from PhilArchive and clicks on external links on PhilPapers.