Reply to Simion
Logos and Episteme 8 (1):113-116 (2017)
Abstract
Mona Simion questions whether there is a distinction between taking back an assertion and taking back only the content of an assertion, as I have claimed. After arguing against the distinction in question, Simion grants that there is a difference between the cases that I use to illustrate the distinction, and thus turns to the task of explaining the difference in a way that keeps it from undermining the knowledge norm. The explanation she offers is in terms of a distinction between doing something that is wrong and doing something that is blameworthy. I respond here by defending the distinction and questioning the explanation she gives of it.Author's Profile
ISBN(s)
2069-0533
DOI
10.5840/logos-episteme2017816
Analytics
Added to PP
2017-03-28
Downloads
116 (#54,970)
6 months
32 (#38,232)
2017-03-28
Downloads
116 (#54,970)
6 months
32 (#38,232)
Historical graph of downloads since first upload
This graph includes both downloads from PhilArchive and clicks on external links on PhilPapers.
How can I increase my downloads?