Reply to Simion

Logos and Episteme 8 (1):113-116 (2017)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

Mona Simion questions whether there is a distinction between taking back an assertion and taking back only the content of an assertion, as I have claimed. After arguing against the distinction in question, Simion grants that there is a difference between the cases that I use to illustrate the distinction, and thus turns to the task of explaining the difference in a way that keeps it from undermining the knowledge norm. The explanation she offers is in terms of a distinction between doing something that is wrong and doing something that is blameworthy. I respond here by defending the distinction and questioning the explanation she gives of it.

Author's Profile

Jonathan L. Kvanvig
Washington University in St. Louis

Analytics

Added to PP
2017-03-28

Downloads
116 (#54,970)

6 months
32 (#38,232)

Historical graph of downloads since first upload
This graph includes both downloads from PhilArchive and clicks on external links on PhilPapers.
How can I increase my downloads?