Courage, cowardice, and Maher’s misstep

Canadian Journal of Philosophy 47 (4):565-587 (2017)
Download Edit this record How to cite View on PhilPapers
Abstract
Could a Nazi soldier or terrorist be courageous? The Courage Problem asks us to answer this sort of question, and then to explain why people are reluctant to give this answer. The present paper sheds new light on the Courage Problem by examining a controversy sparked by Bill Maher, who claimed that the 9/11 terrorists’ acts were ‘not cowardly.’ It is shown that Maher's controversy is fundamentally related to the Courage Problem. Then, a unified solution to both problems is provided. This solution entails that gutsy people who lack good ends are not courageous.
ISBN(s)
PhilPapers/Archive ID
KYLCCA
Upload history
First archival date: 2017-01-04
Latest version: 2 (2017-07-10)
View other versions
Added to PP index
2016-12-21

Total views
239 ( #18,937 of 51,537 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
57 ( #9,345 of 51,537 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads since first upload
This graph includes both downloads from PhilArchive and clicks on external links on PhilPapers.