A regress argument for restrictive incompatibilism

Philosophical Studies 103 (2):201 - 215 (2001)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

Plausibly, no agent ever performs an action without some desire to perform that action. If so, a regress argument shows that, given incompatibilism, we are only rarely free. The argument sidesteps recent objections to this thesis.

Author's Profile

David Vander Laan
Westmont College

Analytics

Added to PP
2009-01-28

Downloads
555 (#42,426)

6 months
65 (#80,558)

Historical graph of downloads since first upload
This graph includes both downloads from PhilArchive and clicks on external links on PhilPapers.
How can I increase my downloads?