Abstract
In this essay we focus on our vast web of beliefs that serves us as a rough and ready
map of reality, generated more to give us comfort and confidence in an intimidating
world than to be accurate. Maps of reality can never be accurate in any ultimate
sense since reality itself is a convoluted entity that can only be accessed in never-
ending layers. Our repertoire of beliefs, generated compulsively in the mind, span a
huge spectrum in respect of ties to affect and emotions on the one hand and of their
credibility in depicting reality on the other. The interaction between our affect-based
psychological needs, our need for having a sound comprehension of reality, and the
infinitely tangled reality itself, leads to the generation of a large diversity of types of
beliefs, where these get revised under the impact of reality by overcoming the restrain-
ing effect of emotions in diverse ways and over diverse time scales—interestingly, the
‘reality’ includes the complex repertoire of affect and emotions itself that may, in cer-
tain cases, generate the impact for our beliefs to change. Beliefs represented by small
clusters in our belief network (see below) are commonly prone to frequent revision in
a more or less random manner, though there are beliefs acquired in early life that are
intransigent to change because of overriding ties to emotions. Beliefs represented by
larger clusters are comparatively durable, and their revision has a systematic aspect to
it because of a greater role of evidence-based factors—however,the evidence may, once
again, be tied with emotions and beliefs oriented away from reason. Finally, there are
prepotent beliefs that are resistant to change even over a lifetime. Often, these beliefs
get revised only if we engage with our own selves, looking at conflicting forces within
ourselves. In this context, we refer to narratives that are self-reinforcing and exercise
almost a mesmerizing influence on us. In all this, there is a dual role of ‘rationality’
that needs being attended to in describing and explaining belief revision—rationality
is not exclusively based on evidence and reason, but includes the implicit operation of
affect and emotions too.