Hypothetical Justifications
RMM:67-82 (2009)
Abstract
A basic conviction in moral non-cognitivism is: only hypothetical norms may be justified. Hartmut Kliemt argues for a moderate variant: there are only hypothetical justifications of norms whether the norms are hypothetical or categorical in kind. In this paper the con- cept of ‘hypothetical justification’ is analyzed. It is argued that hypothetical justifications are not of the kind that we should look for in normative ethics.
Keywords
Categories
PhilPapers/Archive ID
LAHHJ
Upload history
Archival date: 2016-09-29
View other versions
View other versions
Added to PP index
2016-09-29
Total views
119 ( #37,048 of 58,386 )
Recent downloads (6 months)
7 ( #53,142 of 58,386 )
2016-09-29
Total views
119 ( #37,048 of 58,386 )
Recent downloads (6 months)
7 ( #53,142 of 58,386 )
How can I increase my downloads?
Downloads since first upload
This graph includes both downloads from PhilArchive and clicks on external links on PhilPapers.