Reliability of molecular imaging diagnostics

Synthese (S23):5701-5717 (2021)
Download Edit this record How to cite View on PhilPapers
Abstract
Advanced medical imaging, such as CT, fMRI and PET, has undergone enormous progress in recent years, both in accuracy and utilization. Such techniques often bring with them an illusion of immediacy, the idea that the body and its diseases can be directly inspected. In this paper we target this illusion and address the issue of the reliability of advanced imaging tests as knowledge procedures, taking positron emission tomography in oncology as paradigmatic case study. After individuating a suitable notion of reliability, we argue that PET is a highly theory-laden and non-immediate knowledge procedure, in spite of the photographic-like quality of the images it delivers; the diagnostic conclusions based on the interpretation of PET images are population-dependent; PET images require interpretation, which is inherently observer-dependent and therefore variable. We conclude with a three-step methodological proposal for enhancing the reliability of advanced medical imaging.
Reprint years
2019, 2021
ISBN(s)
PhilPapers/Archive ID
LALROM
Upload history
Archival date: 2021-02-05
View other versions
Added to PP index
2019-10-09

Total views
40 ( #58,572 of 64,162 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
11 ( #45,913 of 64,162 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads since first upload
This graph includes both downloads from PhilArchive and clicks on external links on PhilPapers.