The Animal Ethics of Temple Grandin: A Protectionist Analysis

Download Edit this record How to cite View on PhilPapers
This article brings animal protection theory to bear on Temple Grandin’s work, in her capacity both as a designer of slaughter facilities and as an advocate for omnivorism. Animal protection is a better term for what is often termed animal rights, given that many of the theories grouped under the animal rights label do not extend the concept of rights to animals. I outline the nature of Grandin’s system of humane slaughter as it pertains to cattle. I then outline four arguments Grandin has made defending meat-eating. On a protection-based approach, I argue, Grandin’s system of slaughter is superior to its traditional counterpart. Grandin’s success as a designer of humane slaughterhouses however is not matched by any corresponding success in offering a moral defence of meat-eating. Despite, or perhaps because of, the popularity of her work, Grandin’s arguments for continuing to eat animals are noteworthy only in how disappointing and rudimentary they are. If we can thank Grandin for making a difference in the lives of millions of farm animals, her work can also be criticized for not engaging the moral status of animals with the depth and rigor that it deserves.
No categories specified
(categorize this paper)
Reprint years
PhilPapers/Archive ID
Revision history
Archival date: 2019-02-03
View upload history
References found in this work BETA
Practical Ethics.Singer, Peter
Animal Liberation.Singer, Peter. (ed.)
The Case for Animal Rights.Regan, Tom & Midgley, Mary
Practical Ethics.Fischer, John Martin

View all 16 references / Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

Add more citations

Added to PP index

Total views
358 ( #12,393 of 50,406 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
126 ( #3,624 of 50,406 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads since first upload
This graph includes both downloads from PhilArchive and clicks to external links.