Is Shepherd a Bundle Theorist?

Download Edit this record How to cite View on PhilPapers
Abstract
Shepherd appears to endorse something like the following biconditonal regarding qualities and objects. □(An object, O, exists ↔ Some bundle of qualities, Q1, Q2, … Qn exists). There is a growing consensus in the secondary literature that she also takes the right side of this biconditional to ground the left side. I.e. Shepherd is a bundle theorist who takes an object to be nothing but a mass of qualities, or causal powers. I argue here that despite appearances, this interpretation reverses Shepherd's actual view. I.e. I argue that for Shepherd qualities, or causal powers, are grounded in the intrinsic constitutions of objects. In the case of "external objects", these intrinsic constitutions are unknowable to us; in the case of "internal objects", we have direct knowledge of them.
PhilPapers/Archive ID
LANISA-2
Upload history
Archival date: 2022-09-20
View other versions
Added to PP index
2022-09-20

Total views
9 ( #73,563 of 72,585 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
9 ( #62,592 of 72,585 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads since first upload
This graph includes both downloads from PhilArchive and clicks on external links on PhilPapers.