Why a Gunk World is Compatible with Nihilism about Objects

Studia Philosophica Estonica 6 (1):1-14 (2013)
Download Edit this record How to cite View on PhilPapers
Abstract
Ted Sider argues that nihilism about objects is incompatible with the metaphysical possibility of gunk and takes this point to show that nihilism is flawed. I shall describe one kind of nihilism able to answer this objection. I believe that most of the things we usually encounter do not exist. That is, I take talk of macroscopic objects and macroscopic properties to refer to sets of fundamental properties, which are invoked as a matter of linguistic convention. This view is a kind of nihilism : it rules out the existence of objects; that is, from an ontological point of view, there are no objects. But unlike the moderate nihilism of Mark Heller, Peter van Inwagen and Trenton Merricks that claims that most objects do not exist, I endorse a radical nihilism according to which there are no objects in the world, but only properties instantiated in spacetime. As I will show, radical nihilism is perfectly compatible with the metaphysical possibility of gunk. It is also compatible with the epistemic possibility that we actually live in a gunk world. The objection raised by Ted Sider only applies to moderate nihilism that admits some objects in its ontology.
PhilPapers/Archive ID
LEBWAG
Revision history
Archival date: 2013-09-05
View upload history
References found in this work BETA
On Bullshit.Frankfurt, Harry
On the Genealogy of Morality.Nietzsche, Friedrich
Fear of Knowledge.Boghossian, Paul
Relativism.Baghramian, Maria & Carter, J. Adam

View all 23 references / Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

View all 9 citations / Add more citations

Added to PP index
2013-06-18

Total views
762 ( #2,979 of 41,616 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
76 ( #6,847 of 41,616 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads since first upload
This graph includes both downloads from PhilArchive and clicks to external links.