Algorithmic fairness in mortgage lending: from absolute conditions to relational trade-offs

Minds and Machines 31 (1):165-191 (2020)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

To address the rising concern that algorithmic decision-making may reinforce discriminatory biases, researchers have proposed many notions of fairness and corresponding mathematical formalizations. Each of these notions is often presented as a one-size-fits-all, absolute condition; however, in reality, the practical and ethical trade-offs are unavoidable and more complex. We introduce a new approach that considers fairness—not as a binary, absolute mathematical condition—but rather, as a relational notion in comparison to alternative decisionmaking processes. Using US mortgage lending as an example use case, we discuss the ethical foundations of each definition of fairness and demonstrate that our proposed methodology more closely captures the ethical trade-offs of the decision-maker, as well as forcing a more explicit representation of which values and objectives are prioritised.

Author Profiles

Luciano Floridi
Yale University
Michelle Lee
University of Canterbury

Analytics

Added to PP
2020-06-10

Downloads
436 (#49,486)

6 months
100 (#63,022)

Historical graph of downloads since first upload
This graph includes both downloads from PhilArchive and clicks on external links on PhilPapers.
How can I increase my downloads?