Collective Implicit Attitudes: A Stakeholder Conception of Implicit Bias

Proceedings of the 40th Annual Cognitive Science Society (2018)
Download Edit this record How to cite View on PhilPapers
Abstract
Psychologists and philosophers have not yet resolved what they take implicit attitudes to be; and, some, concerned about limitations in the psychometric evidence, have even challenged the predictive and theoretical value of positing implicit attitudes in explanations for social behavior. In the midst of this debate, prominent stakeholders in science have called for scientific communities to recognize and countenance implicit bias in STEM fields. In this paper, I stake out a stakeholder conception of implicit bias that responds to these challenges in ways that are responsive to the psychometric evidence, while also being resilient to the sorts of disagreements and scientific progress that would not undermine the soundness of this call. Along the way, my account advocates for attributing collective (group-level) implicit attitudes rather than individual-level implicit attitudes. This position raises new puzzles for future research on the relationship (metaphysical, epistemic, and ethical) between collective implicit attitudes and individual-level attitudes.
PhilPapers/Archive ID
LEECIA-8
Revision history
Archival date: 2018-05-02
View upload history
References found in this work BETA
Doing Without Concepts.Machery, Edouard

View all 35 references / Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

Add more citations

Added to PP index
2018-05-02

Total views
106 ( #25,100 of 42,137 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
36 ( #18,220 of 42,137 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads since first upload
This graph includes both downloads from PhilArchive and clicks to external links.