Just Probabilities

Noûs (forthcoming)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

I defend the thesis that legal standards of proof are reducible to thresholds of probability. Many have rejected this thesis because it seems to entail that defendants can be found liable solely on the basis of statistical evidence. I argue that this inference is invalid. I do so by developing a view, called Legal Causalism, that combines Thomson's (1986) causal analysis of evidence with recent work in formal theories of causal inference. On this view, legal standards of proof can be reduced to probabilities, but deriving these probabilities involves more than just statistics.

Author's Profile

Chad Lee-Stronach
Northeastern University

Analytics

Added to PP
2023-09-20

Downloads
233 (#57,853)

6 months
233 (#8,043)

Historical graph of downloads since first upload
This graph includes both downloads from PhilArchive and clicks on external links on PhilPapers.
How can I increase my downloads?