In the Name of Equality— An Examination of Equality Arguments for National Self-Government

In Hsin-Wen Lee & Sungmoon Kim (eds.), Reimaging Nation and Nationalism in Multicultural East Asia. New York, USA: Routledge. pp. 36-56 (2018)
Download Edit this record How to cite View on PhilPapers
Abstract
Both Kymlicka and Patten argue that the equal treatment of different national groups require that the state officially recognize the right of each to create its own autonomous government. After carefully examining their arguments, I show that they both make the false assumption that, in a multinational state, the state belongs only to the majority group but not the minority, and that a multination state can never treat minority groups equally. Both claims are inherently anti-pluralistic. Thus, the equal treatment of different national cultures does not require that each be granted the right to self-government.
PhilPapers/Archive ID
LEETEA-3
Revision history
Archival date: 2017-09-22
View upload history
References found in this work BETA

No references found.

Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

No citations found.

Add more citations

Added to PP index
2017-09-21

Total views
157 ( #21,106 of 43,752 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
35 ( #20,284 of 43,752 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads since first upload
This graph includes both downloads from PhilArchive and clicks to external links.