Argument-Forms which Turn Invalid over Infinite Domains: Physicalism as Supertask?

Contemporary Pragmatism 5 (1):1-11 (2008)
Download Edit this record How to cite View on PhilPapers
Abstract
Argument-forms exist which are valid over finite but not infinite domains. Despite understanding of this by formal logicians, philosophers can be observed treating as valid arguments which are in fact invalid over infinite domains. In support of this claim I will first present an argument against the classical pragmatist theory of truth by Mark Johnston. Then, more ambitiously, I will suggest the fallacy lurks in certain arguments for physicalism taken for granted by many philosophers today.
PhilPapers/Archive ID
LEGAWT
Upload history
Archival date: 2021-11-15
View other versions
Added to PP index
2012-10-08

Total views
73 ( #52,695 of 65,755 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
23 ( #33,255 of 65,755 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads since first upload
This graph includes both downloads from PhilArchive and clicks on external links on PhilPapers.