The hardness of the iconic must: can Peirce’s existential graphs assist modal epistemology

Philosophia Mathematica 20 (1):1-24 (2012)
Download Edit this record How to cite View on PhilPapers
Abstract
Charles Peirce's diagrammatic logic — the Existential Graphs — is presented as a tool for illuminating how we know necessity, in answer to Benacerraf's famous challenge that most ‘semantics for mathematics’ do not ‘fit an acceptable epistemology’. It is suggested that necessary reasoning is in essence a recognition that a certain structure has the particular structure that it has. This means that, contra Hume and his contemporary heirs, necessity is observable. One just needs to pay attention, not merely to individual things but to how those things are related in larger structures, certain aspects of which relations force certain other aspects to be a certain way
Reprint years
2012
PhilPapers/Archive ID
LEGTHO
Revision history
Archival date: 2012-10-25
View upload history
References found in this work BETA
Philosophical Investigations.Wittgenstein, Ludwig

View all 41 references / Add more references

Citations of this work BETA
Perceiving Necessity.Legg, Catherine & Franklin, James

Add more citations

Added to PP index
2011-04-16

Total views
373 ( #8,290 of 41,635 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
45 ( #13,838 of 41,635 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads since first upload
This graph includes both downloads from PhilArchive and clicks to external links.