Abstract

This article seeks to explore "the mystery of the plurality of metaphysical concepts" (Patočka). Following a Heideggerian line of reasoning, I will argue that it is due to the non-representational character of being that metaphysics splits into a multitude of alternating approaches. However, unlike Heidegger and his successors, I will propose to understand the non-objectivity of being not as a radical negativity, but rather as an ultra-positive surplus, a hyperbolé. The first part of the article will thus show how metaphysical thought is kept in motion by this hyperbolic element. The second, systematic part will build on this. It will discuss the extent to which the history of metaphysics can be understood as a hyperbolic movement. Finally, the last part will explore ways of establishing a relationship between the hyperbolic dynamics of being and phenomenology.