Esencjalizm, antyhaecceityzm i haecceityzm

Hybris 44 (1):131-151 (2019)
Download Edit this record How to cite View on PhilPapers
Abstract
A standard contemporary formulation of essentialism defines essential properties with a help of a concept of possible worlds. It is often argued that in order to use possible worlds effectively, facts about transworld identity of individuals need to be determined. In this paper I discuss how essentialist might attempt the issue of transworld identity of individuals. Specifically, I analyze a connection between essentialism and the two theories that explain the transworld identity issue, that is, haecceitism and antihaecceitism. I provide a detailed analysis of different variants of antihaecceitism and argue, that all of them are incompatible with basic intuitions that stay behind essentialism. In contrast to that, I defend a position that essentialism ought to be combined with some form of haecceitism. In the remainder of this paper I provide the two ways through which essentialist might be a haecceitist.
Keywords
No keywords specified (fix it)
PhilPapers/Archive ID
LENEAI-3
Revision history
Archival date: 2019-05-05
View upload history
References found in this work BETA

No references found.

Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

No citations found.

Add more citations

Added to PP index
2019-05-05

Total views
25 ( #38,219 of 41,641 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
25 ( #22,744 of 41,641 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads since first upload
This graph includes both downloads from PhilArchive and clicks to external links.